Thursday, August 24, 2017

Smartwatch: Functionality or Fashion Tech?

Now in 2017, we have a lot of smartwatches, brands and products, that we can choose from in the  market.  2 smartwatches take the top of the list of 'to-be-owned' Apple Watch and Samsung Gear S3.  The rests are Huawei's, Motorola's, TicWatch's and more.  All are designed with fashion in mind and functionalities as tech gadget.
 

Historically, the first smartwatch was born in 1983 by Seiko called Data 2000, becuase it can save up to 2000 characters, with external miniturized keyboard and docking for the watch.


It began a newer function of a watch into a smarter gadget.  The follow ups with bigger data storage, easier entry, and even PC linkage.  Several brand names are synonymous with early smartwatch developments are Casio and Timex.  Until 1994, Timex Datalink was born. The first watch with a more complete functionality, including syncing data with Microsoft Schedule+ and bigger memory space.


From 1998 to 2000, Steve Mann developed the first Linux watch that can be categorized as wearable computer instead of just another watch with data functionality (picture below).  He presented this watch at IEEE ISSCC2000 on 7th February 2000.  The bulky and big watch was not popular, but it did become the father of wearable computing device, or as we know now as simply smartwatch.


Since then, the race for smartwatch began to spin faster.  A decade later, the form and shape of modern smartwatch finally took shape in Pebble, a company who raised their funding from Kickstarter program and gave birth to Pebble Watch in 2012.  The first watch that universally could connect to all smartphones available in the market, waterproof, and battery that last for several days.  No touch screen, only 4 buttons to navigate all notifications and apps within the watch.  The race for the best smartwatch now became a reality that we know today.


Today, when buying a smartwatch, we don't need to think about the form factors since all of them have fashionable designs.  We need to think about what phone we have and whether or not we can utilize the smartwatch to it's optimal capability.  We have a lot of brands to choose from: Apple, Samsung, LG, Huawei, Sony, Casio, Suntoo, Fitbit, and still lot more to count.  Even functionalities has been categorized: daily activities, sport, or health.

So what is the capability of the modern smartwatches that we need to consider before deciding which one is for us:

  1. Master connectivity - we need to consider what smartphone we have and whether or not it can run with the smartwatch.  For example Apple Watch only works with Apple iPhone and Android Wear based smartwatches can only work with Android.  Several brands came out with alternative OS and able to connect to almost every OS a smartphone has such as TicWatch (Android based, not Android Wear), the already bakrupt Pebble can connect to all smartphones including Windows Phone, etc.  
  2. Form factor - with excellent designs come matching your style.  Choose the one that you will wear with pride.
  3. Features - with all the smarter functions, comes features and limitations, such as TicWatch connects better with Android compared to Apple iOS and no Windows Phone connectivity.  There are 2 main category of features to be considered hardware and software.  Some smartwatch can run applications independently from the master phone, such as Apple Watch and Samsung Gear S3.  Here are the list of features to be considered and whether or not these smartwatches have them:
  • Battery life - mostly 1 day, but on a busy notifications day, it might not.  Several smartwatches can last more than 5 days running all the time.  Choose what you need.
  • Bluetooth version - with most smartwatches come with Bluetooth 4.0 and some with 4.2, you need to check whether your phone is capable accepting it.  
  • Connectivity apps - smartwatch works if your smartphone has the matching connectivity app, if your phone cannot run this connectivity app then your smartwatch becomes just another overpriced watch.
  • Accelerometer - this feature enable smartwatches to count your steps, if you are into sport, make sure your selected smartwatch has it.
  • GPS - although not a very common feature, but some high-end smartwatch comes with it's own GPS for tracking your daily run distance and tracks.  If you are training for a marathon or have a strict sport routine, this is a must have.
  • Heart rate sensor - despite being inaccurate in most smartwatches, this feature is important if you have fitness program to do or health problems (such as heart problems, etc).  This sensor can be used to identify your first sign of problem or not to overdue your fitness regime.
  • Memory storage - this is a 2 parts consideration: for apps to run independently to the master smartphone, for storing music and storing temporary data.  The first is clear, so it has a space for apps to be installed in the smartwatch.  The second is related to smartwatch capability to connect to thrid party bluetooth device, such as bluetooth earphones or headphones, to play music without the needs for the smartphone.  And the third, depending on how smart you smartwatch is, enables you to store some data in your smartwatch for temporary purposes, such as voice notes, reminders, etc.
  • Screen visibility - with at least 3 types of screen available, you need to choose the right one for your life style and needs.  E-Ink can be seen easily under direct sun light and very light on battery use making the smartwatch last days without charging.  TFT has the richest color and quite bright, but under direct sun light, it becomes invisible and useless.  AMOLED has the brightest screen but for in door use, it is like a torch shining bright, sometimes too bright.  If you work indoor, you might not need AMOLED screen; if you work outdoor, E-Ink smartwatch is preferable.  Each comes with limitations and advatages, you can choose accordingly.
  • Third party connection - without cable, some smartwatches can connect to third party bluetooth device wirelessly, such as headphones or earphones.  You can play music without your phone.  This helps if you want to store your phone in your locker in a fitness center for safety.
  • Strap replacement - some smartwatches require proprietary straps (Samsung Gear S2, Sony Smartwatch 3, Apple Watch, etc) and some can use regular straps.  This is related to your style and choose the one works best.  Honestly I prefer regular straps so I can pick and choose whatever straps available in the market without depending on a certain brand of straps.
  • Telephony function - there are 2 types of telephony functions in smartwatch, using bluetooth as your handsfree to your phone and sim card injected smartwatch.  An alternate version of Samsung Gear S2 is an example of injected SIM Card smartwatch, enabling users to make calls without the need for smartphones.  Most of smartwatches don't have this features and some high-end watches have the handsfree features (like Dick Tracy watch phone).
  • Add ons - this is new and certainly will become something big later on.  Some smartwatches enable add on to enhance their already complex multifunctionality.  Some third party companies add solar charging straps, handsfree functional straps, removable memory storage, and even E-Ink stylish straps.
Consider all the options you have, it is now easier to choose which smartwatch is suitable for you, in fashion or technological sense.  Or is it making it more complicated?

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Tips and Tricks: Split Screen on Android Phone

Well, My Sony Xperia Z5 received Android 7.1.1 Nougat update several months ago.  A unique feature that I used but a lot of people still have not used in Android 7.1 is the split screen.  Samsung introduced this feature several years back with Samsung Galaxy Note and Galaxy S.  Android now includes this feature within the Android environment.  Soon, with Android 8, there will be PIP (Picture in Picture feature).



Split screen is useful for:
- making notes and referencing at the same time
- checking information
- work and play, combined
- Specific to Samsung Galaxy Note, you can scribble in split screen and click and drag a file or item across

To activate split screen is simple, just press and hold active apps list (soft button on the right that looks like a stack of 2 cards.  A split screen of your current active app and the previous app will appear (currently active on top, the predesor will on bottom screen.

The easiest use that I keep coming back to is checking IMDB when watching a TV Series as reference.  I don't need to go back and forth between 2 apps, so I still watch the tv series and checking IMDB at the same time.

You can do this for work related matters and more, like opening a link to website on the bottom from an email, etc.  Of course, I would recommend that you do this for bigger screen phones (5.5" or above).

Have fun, guys

Saturday, September 10, 2016

Finally, New Technology Breakthrough Are Introduced

It has been a while that I add article to this Blog. Almost 2 years to be exact. The reason being, there not much game changing technologies introduced in the market that actually excites me. The introduction of SmartWatch was big, but it was just a refinement of older technology development. There was no intense excitement in the gadget world, until this September 2016.

Two introduction of new products caught my attention: iPhone 7 family of smartphones and Lenovo Yoga Book. One is a major breakthrough, while the other is actually a minor one instead.

The introduction of iPhone 7 smartphone family without the analog 3.5 mm headphone jack took the world by storm and controversy. Technologists, reviewers, and news media took this development as a storm brewing and changing the world as we know it. In my humble opinion, it's just a minor development. If Apple didn't do it, someone will.

You might wonder why do I think that iPhone 7 without headphone jack is a minor development which is overblown in a gigantic proportion. Well, here are the reasons:

1. June 2016 introduction of Bluetooth 5.0 and its Implementation is coming at the latest early 2017.

Bluetooth wireless technology is the base backbone of current audio wireless technology. Up to version 4.2, Bluetooth is still has major limitation on how much data can be relayed, at max 2.1 Mbps (based on Bluetooth 4.0 specification) or 260 kbps on Bluetooth Low Energy. However,  Bluetooth 5.0 is promised to break the data transfer barrier to 4x the data amount, which means even 24 bit 96 kHz hifi audio quality can be transferred with ease. Do make a note that despite incredible higher speed of data transfer. Bluetooth requires additional data package to be transferred along with audio, hence at max 50% of the max limit will be used for audio data.

But Apple doesn't gamble their name, in fact they will make sure iPhone 7 current or next model is Bluetooth 5.0 compatible. With audio protocol apTX HD being introduced in July 2016, this guarantee iPhone 7 smartphone family is the safe bet of the top of the line smartphone in the market.

2. High End Personal Audio Equipments are now Affordable

Personal Audio industry has bloomed beyond what it was 4 decades ago. The development of portable DAC (Digital to Analog Converter) and micro amplifier have been going towards the micro-size that both will fit into the volume controller module or Earbuds or Earphones body. This technological development ensures those less then adequate audio data sound quality will be improved to significant higher level.

3. Bluetooth Headset Goes Smaller

If you browse through Kickstarter, Indiegogo, eBay or other gadget selling Web marketplace, you will find not 1 or 2, but a big selection of Bluetooth earphones at the size of our outer ear canal from various manufacturers, from cheap small China factories to major brands such as Motorola, Samsung, Sony, etc. These products are maturing right now and more higher quality Bluetooth earphones are being introduced weekly.  AirPods is not a new technology breakthrough, but only Apple's take on those tiny earphones.

In summary, Apple has been known to attract media news makers eyes to them. The introduction of iPhone 7 without headphone jack is not a real major breakthrough. It has been long overdue and it is nothing more but a minor step forward in technology world.

The second product introduction is the working and ready to market Lenovo Yoga Book. It is a Lenovo laptop with 2 10" screen facing each other. Yes, Nintendo has done it first, but only for gaming. Similar technology has also been introduced again and again by other manufacturers and innovators, but nothing like what Lenovo has introduced with Lenovo Yoga Book.

Remember the introduction of the first Samsung Galaxy Note, no one cared. I was so excited by the original Samsung Galaxy Note that I bought a unit at the launching event. The reason was it was the first time someone or some people implemented the use of stylus with the right functionalities. Now, regardless the Note 7 battery disaster, the world still recognizes Samsung Galaxy Note as one of the best smartphone series in the world.

Lenovo Yoga Book is, in my humble opinion, the combination of the right technologies the right way that will change the way we use our tablets, netbooks, or laptops. There are noticeable miscalculations by Lenovo apparent already, similar to Galaxy Note first introduction, but it will still change the way we use and perceived future handheld computers.

Yoga Book was introduce for multipurpose tablet/laptop. You can type using highlighted soft keyboard on the bottom screen which will be activated when we position both screen in laptop configuration (top screen straight up), Yoga Book is now a laptop. You can flip the bottom screen to the back to form a slightly heavier tablet. The upside down V shaped (or make a roof configuration) for watching movies for entertainment purposes.

The last configuration is what determines Yoga Tablet as the major breakthrough in laptop technology, the vertical book configuration. We can use stylus or pen on included pads and papers on the keyboard screen. Whatever we draw or write on the pads will be transferred to Yoga Book as notes, drawings, or editing purposes.  This feature is the key ingredient that will change the way we use tablets and laptops in the future.  Regardless on how advance the technology is, we have not yet abandoned pen and paper. Simply because pen and paper is still the best and most flexible way to take notes and make arts. By combining hardware and software development, Lenovo has produced the most natural way of using laptop/tablet into part of our daily life further.

For those reasons, Lenovo Yoga Book introduction is, in my humble opinion, the major breakthrough that will change the way we use computers in the future.

What do you think, guys? Feel free to comment

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Learning from Sony Walkman

Learning from Sony Walkman | Michael Anton Sim | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/learning-from-sony-walkman-michael-anton-sim

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Review:Sony NWZ-ZX1 Part 2

As promised, this time I matched up Sony NWZ-ZX1 with Sony MDR1RBT Mark II.

Before I proceed with the review, I like to state some opinions, humbly.

When I bought Sony NWZ-ZX1, there are some comments in the Internet regarding this unit. A lot of it revolve around the following list of disappointments:
- not enough Amplification power to support highest end, or big, headphones
- sound quality, hissing noise apparent in various high and low resolution recordings
- Android based system

In my humble opinion, Sony is following iPod steps. Sony is known being closed to Apple since Jobs days and Jobs' vision on music players is clearly apparent on the new Sony's Walkman line up:
- Sony designed their new Walkman to cope with the ever growing high end headphone listeners' demand of wanting to play FLAC, Wave, etc format recordings. However, like Steve Jobs designs, Sony follows the trend of the majority listeners who don't want to bring around heavy, power hungry, high-end headphone. Most listeners want good quality of music with light weight, portable, yet high quality headphones that has become the major trends. So they designed NWZ-ZX1 with enough power to match up with mid end heaphones which also works with iPod, but for those who wants to listen to highes end of headphones will most likely use external amplifiers anyhow, regardless what Sony has provided.
- Straight out of the box, NWZ-ZX1 has a hiss consistently. This is because of the sound settings are not yet set to listeners individual likings. It is similar to Vanilla Android, it's up to the listeners to customize the sound characteristics they like. Here is one feature that Sony should have for future updates: multi sound profile easy access or programmable sound profiling.
- Android is one of the most flexible and powerful Mobile OS available. If iOS have Apple iTunes, Sony wants to be the choice as the music players for quality conscious listeners. This is apparent with Sony releasing their Walkman and sound quality app to Google Play Store.
- In addition, with Android OS platform, Sony can upgrade and update their Walkman app as required and requested by the market. Making their app more appealing for most listeners.

Those are what I feel I need to say, so now we continue with the review.

Sound Setting

After using Sony MDR1RBT Mark II with Sony NWZ-ZX1 for almost 3 weeks now, I have saved an EQ setting that I like since this setting boost the treble and provide punchy, detailed but deep enough bass. I tried the preset Rock EQ, I don't really like it. I prefer this setting or ClearAudio+ on depending on the headphone I used.


Important Note

I have upgraded the firmware of NWZ-ZX1 to the latest Build No. 1.13.0009 which improve the Wave playing. I did noticed Wave recordings became more like the FLAC. Previously, more trebles are played. This might be also one of the reasons NWZ-ZX1 was complained by listeners to have hissing on certain recordings. But then again, it's my opinion.


Sony NWZ-ZX1 with Sony MDR1RBT Mark II - Wired



First, of course the wired matching of Sony MDR1RBT Mark II with NWZ-ZX1. As most of you have read feom Headfi and Internet reviews regarding Sony's MDR1 Mark II series, it is a flat but uniquely rich with Sony's sound signature. It is a detailed headphone but can present deep and punchy bass, smooth treble, and lushful, sweet voice.

When combined with NWZ-ZX1, I understand why Sony are pushing forward both products as a matching pairs in the their promotional materials. This combination is such a beautiful and enjoyable that I considered both are designed for each other.

Listening to Linkin Park's In Pieces, the intro became a lot more intimate. Blank sound on right ear while guitar acoustic plays in left ear. The speedy and playful drums and bass guitar represented well without slow down. And then, the impactful drum plays handsomely that made wants to dance a bit myself. Do note that I don't dance so just gives you a picture of how fun the combo is.

Then I switched to Louis Armstrong. I set the surround sound effect to Studio, but I hear this song as if I was sitting in front of stage. Louis' voice came from a bit above me, the strings orchestra on his left at a good distance. To his right side, a guitar and next the bass player and a drummer. Louis' voice arw so intimate that I feel like I'm watching the historic recording.
Note: When I turned on ClearAudio+, this song becomes different. Louis' vocal surround me as if coming from a set of 2 big speakers.

Next, I played John Mellencamp's Wild Night, the song that Monster Beats headphones and speakers always play it wrong. The intro's pounding drum beats, consistent cymbal taps and tambourine are perfectly sounding. John Mellencamp and Me'Shell Ndegeocello's vocals are playing in front and the band members are playing behind them.

Another difficult song for headphones to play correctly is Nightwish's Bye Bye Beautiful. The intro's first drum impact usually played with lost of power. Sansa Clip+ manages to play right, but my Sony Xperia Z Ultra failed. NWZ-ZX1 managed to play it correctly.
Note: When I turned on ClearAudio+, the song becomes very dark and thick with bass.

I was about to call it the night by listening to Rihanna's We Found Love and find this song plays like I am in my living room with 5.1 home theatre setup. However, when changed the audio setting to ClearAudio+, I was transported to Club hall with the bass shaking the ground. This is impressive, I find new amd unexpected excitements with NWZ-ZX1.

This matching definitely brings out the best in both. NWZ-ZX1 is clearly a far more superior player than my SanDisk Sansa Clip+ by several levels with its ability to play a bigger range of audio frequency with 'fun' as the main spirit.



Next: Sony NWZ-ZX1 with Sony MDR1RBT Mark II - Bluetooth

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Review: Sony NWZ-ZX1 Part 3

As promised, here us the continuing review on NWZ-ZX1 with the Bluetooth function with Sony MDR1RBT Mark II. I need to apologize since that's the only Bluetooth high end headphone that I have.

One signature that I found a bit disappointing is the hissing background noise that exist in all songs I played. Less hiss on 24bit recordings, more on lower quality stuffs, especially on MP3 at 192 kbs or lower. The hiss is not truly bothersome, just a low hiss. Some people might not even notice it. It just exists at the background. Some other reviewers mentioned that it is caused by the SMaster build-in amp. I don't know the real reason tho.

Anyhow, from all the same songs played from the previous part 2, one thing is also certain that this player turns MDR1RBT Mark II into a basshead headpiece with details and wide sound stage. The bass becomes so prominent across all songs that it tends to makes the songs more fun on dance genre and dark on rock genre, at the same time loss some of the sharpness.

The high frequency lost it's sharpness, the low lack depth and loss some impact, but vocal is still sweet and lushful. It does remind me of Monster Beats sound signature. Should Sony add a tad more impact, MDR1RBT Mark II will sound like the classic Audio Technica ATH-M50.

At least with all the lost frequencies, Sony's decisiona to use Bluetooth 3.0 is a smart decision indeed. One song that I always use to test Bluetooth headphones is Nightwish' Bye Bye Beautiful. Almost all Bluetooth headphones wavered when playing this song, losing their dynamic bass impact at the first beat of the drum; it's like the headphone lost power, which it is. Even MDR1RBT Mark II lost a tiny power to play it, however MDR1RBT Mark II keeps trying to maintain its power, thanks to the built-in amp in the headphone I believe. Smart move, Sony.

I do noticed that when playing dance beat songs, the music becomes more enjoyable and less analytical. Hence, details become less. The soundstage simulate club space, including the woofers. You definitely can feel the rumbling. Which means this piece is a killer wireless cans to watch movies.

Action movies come to live, transporting me to the cinema. I just hope Sony has the sense to produce Bluetooth feature into their Blu-ray players. However, due to the nature of HiRes Audio plauer NWZ-ZX1 is, playing movies on this unit is not a fun option. The audio player characteristic quality kicked in and never left, so movies audio become too flat to enjoy. I recommend Sony Xperia Z series or Samsung Galaxy 5" screen or above for superior movie watching enjoyment.
Note: Why I do not recommend other brands? Read my previous articles and you will find my bad experiences with other brands.

Rock music, however, suffers a bit. The bass is too loud, especially when the ClearAudio+ is on. It took me a while to finally programmed the equalizer to have suitable sound characteristics, but it is still lacking depth, compared to the wired sound.

One thing I noticed NWZ-ZX1 has offered is the option to prioritize quality over audio connection. This feature is helpful to eliminate network noises in frequency busy places. You can find the option in Settings, Bluetooth, Menu, Sound Enhancements dan Wireless Playback Quality.


Now, comparing NWZ-ZX1 and Astell&Kern AKs as Bluetooth music player, I must say AKs are superior, but with over 30% price difference, I would settle with NWZ-ZX1 because of other benefits that AKs don't provide.

So there, Sony NWZ-ZX1 in 3 parts (I want to write other match up, like UE700, etc, but I don't want to bore you guys. So let me know if you want me to continue on). This 30th anniversary Walkman is Sony's effort to bring back Walkman into the market. I consider this series successful. I see more amd more music listeners buy Walkman (ZX1, A15, F887, etc). It's a high quality DAP, although not for the big cans fanatics, but for daily commuters and students who want to listen for excellent music, this player and it's younger siblings are definitely the right choice, especially HiRes Audio DAP on the budget. Heck, even FIIO immediately retaliates with X1. High end DAP is definitely gone light-weight portable. More options are better for us, right?

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Review: Sony NWZ-ZX1 Part 1

Introduction - Why I Choose Sony NWZ-ZX1

Among all high end, or rather high resolution, Digital Audio Players, Sony has not been in consideration for years due to their stubborn policy of not playing several popular formats of high resolution audio recordings such as: FLAC, ALAC, AIFF, and more. This decision positioned Sony as the producer of retail mid end DAP that relies solely on MP3 based format. Even with research on developing MP3 format to a higher sounding format, not many fanatics of high resolution audio listeners were interested to use Sony's Walkman as their main DAP.

Until 2014, 35 years after Sony hatched the first product line of portable audio called Walkman, Sony decided to open the door and accepted their products to play nearly all formats of high end audio recording, the result: the 35th Anniversary Walkman called NWZ-ZX1.



I first got my interest on ZX1 after the Sony's announcement of the next portable high resolution audio player Walkman series A (NWZ-A15 and A17). Those 2 new units are sexy, well built and most likely to storm the market and win a lot casual listeners. I was about to shop for iBasso DX50 or AK100, which for those keen on high resolution audio immediately recognized as 2 of most preferred DAP in the market. And after reading tons of references in the Internet I found so many stories about how great both products are that I tested them both. They are exemplary excellent DAP in their own rights.

One notable feature that AK100 and ZX1 both have is Bluetooth; AK100 employs Bluetooth 3.0 (AK100 II uses Bluetooth 4.0) and ZX1 uses Bluetooth 3.0. So both are able to stream higher resolution sounds.

The Review

Design

All are designed to last and abuse, although DX50 is sturdier in comparison, ZX1 has its own perk of being the lightest and tiniest volume-wise among the three.

However, when walking around listening to music, I found ZX1 is more comfortable in my hand especially for prolonged listening for its lighter weight and smartphone sized body. Even with the lower back protruding in an awkward way, it tends to assist my hand in avoiding slippage combined with the leather-like material to cover the aluminium frame.

The touch screen is well-sized, and the physical buttons are well placed and again well-thought-out to present easy access by soft touch recognition, with little dots and different sizes. I love using the physical buttons since they are easy to recognize even without looking at the unit. However, the hardened leather-like case lacking access to the buttons really sucks.


User Interface

I'll keep it short, it's an older Android OS. Easy to use and access. Not the richest in features but adequate for listeners. Later on I'll review the apps available for this unit.


The Sound Impression

I put a lot consideration on how to represent the sound impression I get. I prefer to approach it differently this time around since talking about high end DAP won't be fair if not paired with the headphone used. That means the combination will come to account, since I have (although cheaper variances) several unique sound headphones, I will try to provide combination impression. So here we go, I hope you enjoy my approach.


Sony NWZ-ZX1 with Sennheiser MX760



Both are known for the wide sound staging. So what happened if I paired them together?

First of all, Senn MX760 is definitely a treble rich earbud with deep bass and big sound stage. So I tested it without EQ, but the treble becomes a bit too much. Then I turned on the ClearSound+ feature which nullified all eq settings to Sony pre-programmed sound signature, both literally become a new favorite matching for serious detail-minded listening.

I played Louis Armstrong's What a Wonderful Day and if I close my eyes, I swear I can imagine Louis standing in front with violin players close to his left and drums and guitar further on his rear right side, bass player right side closer than the drums. The music and voice so clear that I have high appreciation on the 24 bit and 96 kHz recording. Even Louis signature lips play can be heard.

Then I played Linkin Park's In Pieces (from Minutes to Midnight album with 16/44 recording) and for a small earbud to represent ZX1 sound, it is unbelievably enjoyable experience. Big impact and deep bass, voice and instruments separation are clear and well-placed, smooth treble. The sound are loaded with details.

Those 2 songs I think has represented how well they both match up.

Note: Warning high impact bass means do not start the music with high volume, especially over 80%. It will be painful. I used 60% max volume which are plenty already.

On the downer side, some treble heavy songs and lower recording quality (128kbps MP3 or lower) becomes too sharp and too noisy to listen due to MX760 sensitivity of details, despite of Sony's DSEE HX feature turned on to smoothen the roughness.


Bonus Impression:
SanDisk Sansa Clip+ with Sennheiser MX760

Sansa Clip+ is a cheap but a high quality player, however it doesn't have the range ZX1 has. Two major differences that separates the two:

- Clip+ bass is tight and detailed but lacking the depth and clarity.
- Clip+ has a smaller sound staging, the right analogy would be comparing a 1x1x1 cubical meter (Clip+) to a Studio size room (ZX1)

Don't get me wrong, I love my Clip+ as a casual daily driver. I have been using it for a couple of years. It's tiny size and light weight just slip to my shirt pocket inconspicuously without becoming a burden. While ZX1 requires a belt wallet or case to be used without bothering my movement.

Each has their own purpose.

So there, my first part of Sony NWZ-ZX1 impression. Next I will pair it with Sony MDR1RBT Mark II, wired and Bluetooth connected. Each has it's own sound signature that a little different one to another, especially with some hidden Sony NWZ-ZX1 features turned on.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Comparison: Ultrasone HFI450 vs Sony MDR1RBT Mark II vs Audio Technica ATH-M50 (classic black)

The 3 listed headphones are my favorite headphones. Ultrasone HFI450 has been my loyal companion for years. Now, Sony MDR1RBT Mark II has started taking over its place due to the fact that it has Bluetooth functionality. Then the one headphone that I have always wanted to have but has never been able to own it: Audio Technica M50. All 3 are the definitive all-rounder headphones so you can listen to any music genre you like with any of the 3.
Just a small note, my Holy Grail of headphones is Ultrasone Edition 8.





Any way, let's start the comparison shall we?

Physical Features:
1. Design: Sony MDR1RBT Mark II is the definitive winner

Regardless of anything, I haven't seen any headphone designed to impress. It's one d### sexy headpiece. Matte black finish with a gracefully placed metallic maroon lines, brushed platinum joints and soft luxurious leathers cushioning and padding. Need I say more?

2. Comfort

Okay, soft memory foam-like cushioning brings Sorry MDR1RBT Mark II as the winner. You can wear this baby for hours and never feel uncomfortable. The tightness of the cans has been measured extremely well while others are trying to clamp themselves to my head.
Audio Technica ATH-M50 came second since it's tighter and with firmer foam. Ultrasone HFI450 is also comfortable but it has the hardest foam of the 3. Although I can wear any of the 3 all day.

2. Sound Quality

- Treble/High Frequency
All 3 are have very clear and excellent treble, but Ultrasone HFI450 does sharper and brighter high. Listening to rock and alternative metal songs sounded like the drummer danced with the cymbals in front of my ears, I mean like I'm sitting on the drummer's chair and play the drums. Being an all-rounder headphone, Ultrasone HFI450 is a unit I would recommend to any beginner Headfiers since it is cheaper and you will understand why Hifi or high end headphones are sooo much fuuun.
Both Sony MDR1RBT Mark II and Audio Technica ATH-M50 has controlled treble. Both produce smoother treble in comparison, no harshness but clear and well defined.

- Mid Frequency
Sony MDR1RBT Mark II won this one. This cans certainly have a flatter frequency reproduction with a twist.
The other 2 are definitely tuned to have V-Shaped equalizer so the mid-range frequency are a bit suppressed.

- Bass/Low Frequency
Oh wow, all 3 has bass that I like and each has different characteristics. I will explain why.
First the Ultrasone HFI450. It is tuned as a bass dominant headphone. The bass has enough impact for fun listening but not for bass-head due to the equally lively treble. Ultrasone's S-Logic prevents bass impact to attact my ear drums so that means less fun, but safer/healthier. The detail of the bass is a bit eliminated by the can's limited frequencies reach (20Hz - 20kHz). That also means HFI450 can't really reproduce lower and deeper bass.
Audio Technica ATH-M50 is has bigger frequency range so and it's bass impact is such a legend. It can however reproduce the details of the instruments that place ATH-M50. You can hear the details of the bass and at the same with little loss of details. This is the cans you will love you use for fun and high-spirited listening.
Like Ultrasone HFI450, Sony MDR1RBT Mark II employs a similar technology. It doesn't shoot the music to your ears directly, instead it shoot the music to your ear walls. So the bass impact is more powerful, but not as powerful as ATH-M50 that shoots the music directly to your ear canals. Among the 3, MDR1RBT produces astonishing details and it does play deeper bass. For music listening, MDR1RBT wired is my weapon of choice when listening to complex music since it is capable of producing the most details.

Special Note on Sony MDR1RBT Mark II :
Being a Bluetooth and wired headphone, Sony has dual characteristics. Bluetooth has less details but certainly it's built-in amp drives a slightly powerful bass. While wired, MDR1RBT Mark II is more flat (not truly flat flat) and analytical so less impact on the bass but definitely deeper and detailed bass instruments.

Sound Separation:
Winner Sony MDR1RBT Mark II. It plays the most detailed separation of sound and very natural sounding. The minor upgrade that Sony gave to Mark II is making the headphone Bluetooth listening fun, while wired a tad more analytical quality like the original.
I must say both ATH-M50 and HFI450 is about even in this case.

Sound Staging :
No 1 is of course Sony MDR1RBT Mark II with the slightly crooked positioning of their driver to bounce frequency before reaching listeners ear drums. The music sounded naturally comes from a wider room, like in a studio. I can locate where each musician is located and how far they are from me. Please note the digital music player and the source format plays important role also. Interestingly enough, in Bluetooth mode, MDR1RBT Mark II is better at sound staging compared to the wired mode. It's build-in amp is brilliant.
No 2 is Ultrasone HFI450. The drivers are located below ears so sound travels around ear lobs before landing to ear drums. It is the safest headphone also since it has the least pressure to ear drums no matter how high the volume is. However, its sound staging is different. You feel you place yourself behind the musicians instead of in the musicians circle or in front of them. Think of it like you are sitting on the drummer's seat and listen.
No 3 is Audio Technica ATH-M50. Being a direct blasting headphone, it has the thinnest sound staging. It is a more fun headphone if you don't care about sound staging, but you need to be careful with the volume since it has the highest sound pressure among the 3.

Special Note on Sony MDR1RBT Mark II :
This might not count as music listening headphone, but Sony MDR1RBT Mark II is incredible when used to play movies. I feel like I'm in a theatre. I feel the rumbling of the woofer in action movies and definitely accurate surround sound. If you use the headphone for playing movies, this is my choice of can. It is as if MDR1RBT Mark II has dual personality, for movie watching and high-end music player.
The others don't have such characteristics.

Quiet Tone:
Sony MDR1RBT Mark II wins. It is more quiet then others is presenting zero sound. Usually it marks the higher end of headphones driver.

Final Judgement

All 3 has different characteristics and each has its own extra points. I personally now grab MDR1RBT Mark II more often since it delivers musics and movies the way I love. It does have drawbacks especially when listening to lower end recordings, despite of the masking Sony system does, I still can hear the imperfections. I prefer to use the Bluetooth functionality when listening through a smartphone, especially lower quality songs recording. But each headphone has its own merits and worth the purchase. I love all 3 cans but favor Sony and Ultrasone.

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Sony MDR1RBT MARK II THE REVIEW

As promised, here comes the review of the famous SONY MDR1RBT MARK II.

Voted by Headfi critics as one of, if not, the best Bluetooth high-end headphone currently available in the market, Sony MDR1RBT Mark II does live up to it's hype. From physical quality to sound quality, this unit truly define a masterpiece. Do I recommend it to you guys? Let me review it first, you can be the judge.

Let's Get Physical

Physically, MDR1RBT Mark II is made of plastic, I think at least 85% are definitely plastic. Compared to other top end branded masterpiece headphones, MDR1RBT certainly looks at par by appearance, especially with their decision to use metallic red and black matte finishing.  But when you touch and hold it in your hands, you know it is plastic through and through. Don't get me wrong, it is high quality plastic, not some cheapo low grade plastic.

MDR1RBT design however outshines most top end headphones by its modern take on classic over-ear design. Hence, Sony designers tried hard to hide most of the buttons away from plain sight, so those who are not familiar with the Bluetooth varian will definitely think it's unwired (off) MDR1.

Unlike the original MDR1, MDR1RBT 3.5mm connection is hidden by rubber flap at bottom left ear cup,  so the flap needed to be opened when using this unit with its wire. I found it a bit disappointing since the original looks better with the cable hanging on left cup frame. Plus the opened rubber flap, although not very apparent, bugs me just because I know the flap is opened wide.  Being the Mark II, Sony should updated the 3.5mm connector to look like one found in MDR10RBT instead.

The cushion looks great and well placed. Enough said.

The metal brush and real metal on the rotating joints before the cups are brilliant MDR1 signature design also.

Does MDR1RBT can match the so-called cool headphones by Monster Beats? My answer is if you are a teenager with untrained ears, then Monster Beats headphones are your accessories to look cool and Monster Beats are the 'cool' ones.  However, if you are a mature and have trained ears, MDR1RBT (or other MDR1 series) does look far better. A more mature and executive like.

Why didn't I mention it as cool design for younger listeners? Well, I think Sony positioned MDR10 series for the younger listeners, smaller-lighter-cheaper.

The Wear

The trick with a 30-hour long battery life per charge is how long can you use it comfortably, of course. Despite the pressure of the cups on my head being a bit loose to my personal taste, MDR1RBT does feel comfortable for hours of usage. I used it for 3 hours straight without realizing that I'm using a full size headphone on my head.

Practical Side

Here is where Sony's brilliant design has flaws. All MDR1 series can only be folded flat,  meaning both cups twist 90° so it can be put on the table flat. It's a big unit, even the younger brother MDR10RBT still quite a big unit since it can only get flattened.

Arguments on the users of MDR1 series won't travel with this unit in their backpack is not a valid excuse not to improve on the practicality of having a headphone that can be folded to a smaller portable size.

On the other side of arguments, being a Bluetooth headset, you wan wear them all the time so that's why Sony made it so d### comfortable.

The Soul

Sound is always the main point for me in buying a headphone. I'm very fond of my Ultrasone HFI450 and Ultimate Ears UE700, so I'm in tune with V shaped equalizer, wide soundstage, extended details, deeper bass and good bass impact.

MDR1RBT being a Sony's product, it has a flatter equalizer than my other pieces. Vocal does become the favorite when listening via this unit. It's lushful and wonderfully natural. Emotional singers will project how they feel to the listeners. It's not what I consider vocal-focussed headset, but vocal is shining bright.

Bass, well, hmmmmmm. I must say MDR1RBT dynamic impact is superior to Ultrasone HFI450. It's tighter and more detailed.

High frequency, however, is very controlled. Don't get me wrong, every sound is reproduced clearly. This unit is tuned to control the treble not to be too sharp,  but clear and smooth. For me, it's like eating spicy food with the heat but not the pain.

Soundstage and sound separation are both brilliant. Using indirect sound wave path to ear calculation, Sony successfully created a beautiful level of soundstage within a closed environment. Added by the Sony's own technology to reproduce sound, MDR1 series in general have won so many critics hearts, including mine.

Bluetooth sound quality is by far the best to my ears. I did test MDR10 at Headfonia store (credit to Mr.  Yudie) a while back, the difference is pretty significant in details quality,  especially the bass. It's a totally different ball game there.
Furthermore, when using Bluetooth, the build-in amp will kick in and produce a more powerful sound compared to when used using wire. A lot of people said that Sony has apps on Android and iOS to support MDR1 series, but I haven't found it yet, Info anyone? Pretty please?

Final note on sound quality, the soul of the headphone, MDR1RBT is designed as all rounder headphone, so it doesn't link to a certain music category. However, I do find it superior when playing acoustic and vocal-based songs,

The Bomb

Well, just my luck. Currently, I'm using my second unit of MDR1RBT MKII. The first unit apparently has faulty battery that it failed to be recharged after I bought it. So I claimed it to Sony Service Center in my town (not without a little incidence of public explosion of anger). Sony decided to replace my unit with a new one. Bravo Sony on providing good, not yet excellent, customer satisfaction.

I just hoped that once they repair my unit, they don't sell it as new unit. They should use it as demo unit instead.

Closing

There you go, my take on SONY MDR1RBT MARK II.


Sunday, September 7, 2014

The Hunt for Headphone Ended

Ypu know, of all the strange things that happened to me, I have to end up with the strangest, if I must say so. I found a my drea,  headphone unplanned and without thinking. Of all the list of headphones that I checked, Sony MDR10RBT is the hardest to find. Somehow Sony Indonesia doesn't seem seriously release it. That includes Sony MDR1RBT Mark II.

So, now what to do?

Just today, out of the blue, I found 1 new unit of Sony MDR1RBT Mark II. According to the store staff, Sony has only dropped 2 units,  1 for sell and the other a demo unit. So, out of instinct and frustration on other things in life, I decided to entertain myself and buy Sony MDR1RBT Mark II. The 30-hour Bluetooth and wired headphone that received highest rave of positive reviews from every reviewers in the Internet.

There you go, all the months of planning and testing, O ended up the highest end of headphones that I have ever buy.

Coming soon,  the personal review.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

The Hunt for Headphone continues

You know what, after considering all options, I'm going with Bluetooth headphone. My targets :
- Jabra Revo Wireless
- Creative WP350
- Sony MDR10RBT

I'll post my reviews later.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Budget HeadFi Fun: Hunting for under $100 Headfi

Long, long time ago, well almost a decade to be exact, I found my first headfi headphone: the powerhouse Sennheiser HD-477. It's the beginning of a love affair that I didn't expect to last such a long time.

2014, with a new office came a need for a new budget HeadFi piece to stay in my desk drawer, ready to serve me anytime. But being in an open space office, a close full size headphone is ideal. My trusted favorite Ultrasone HFI450 is my first choice, but I don't have the heart to leave it back in my desk drawer. There it began my hunt for a new closed headphone, it must have sound so good that I want to use it, but cheap enough to leave it behind in my office drawer.

After months of search without result, I have tested several budget headphones and ended with a collection of sound signature in my head that I love but at the same time didn't get selected. Here are theorist of candidates:
1. Panasonic RP-HX550
2. Sennheiser HD 202

As my player, my trusted SanDisk Sansa CLIP+ 8GB.

As my reference: Audio Technical M-50

Since I have not selected.any one of those 2 headphones, I keep on searching.

My review, or rather my take, on the 2 candidates:

1. Panasonic RP-HX550


Just being.launched in 2014, Panasonic new headpiece the RP-HX550 is definitely my biggest surprise. Found by accident while trying to go to a Men's Room in a mall in Jakarta, the HX550 looks inviting with those brushed metal finished on closed plastic earpiece look stylish and definitely worth to test. At $80, I would consider it a bargain.

First Look Impression: nice finish with the plastic and metal material combo. The single wire connector with a flat tangle-free cable definitely add to its premium style.

First Sound Impression: Wow, V shaped equalizer
High - smooth and detailed, it didn't register as high fidelity high, but it is at participating with the like of Sennheiser HD 202 with a winning smoothness. For those looking for detailed smooth sounding high frequency in headphone, this is a keeper.
Mid - the singer voice is less focused and rather weird sounding. I would not recommend HX550 to voice headfi lovers.
Low - I am shocked by the sound, a good shock. It is clear and deeper with more details than expected from Panasonic headphone, especially consumer version. Don't get me wrong, HX550 is a warm headphone with a touch of treble details. Definitely a keeper for music lover, but not for voice centric lover. Lower in fun (bass) and details compared.to Audio Technical M-50, but details and soundstage to.match M-50.

2. Sennheiser HD 202


Bass monster on-ear Sennheiser HD 202 definitely will satisfy bass lovers and also superior in details.compared to Beats headpieces. Being closed unit, HD 202 has straight forward sound, especially compared to the older brother that I happened to own HD 477 (open headphone with better details and soundstage).

This headphone felt like I was wearing subwoofer for a.headphone. Bass details are replaced by bass explosion, a powerful one that is.
High - sweet
Mid - good
Low - powerful volume and impact but lacking.details
I would say inability to deliver details of music is what made me doubtful, especially compared to M-50.

Which will be my earpiece? I will let you know soon

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Sony Xperia Z Ultra Hands On Review

Alright, for those who followed.this blog, you know that I'm a suckered for Samsung Galaxy Note N7000, aka the original Galaxy Note. In recent years, that is the smartphone that I used for over 18 months until it became too obsolete that everything become unbearably slow to operate.

2013 is probably the slowest year for me in regards of Android smartphones, except for 2 smartphones: Asus Padfone 2 and Sony Xperia Z series.

I must say, those 2 enticed me with their creative solutions that I decided to buy Asus. Unfortunately, that was a decision that I regretted due to hardware flaws and weaknesses.

2014, I went backward and purchase the abdominal Sony Xperia Z Ultra, this 1920x1080-true-HD-6.44"-screen-2.2ghz-quad-core is the current record breaker of thinnest and biggest screen for a phone category.

As an old fan.of SGNote, stylus writing capabilities and features to support it are something that I yearned when using Asus Padrone 2 or my just retired Polytron Quadra HD. Sony creatively put an incredible amount features to their Z series, including their giant Z Ultra. Those features made my SGNote becomes a museum piece.

Sony Xperia Z Ultra exceptional and useful features (that I know of, and I believe I will find more soon enough):

- Reading/Accessing portable hard disk
Z Ultra ability to access portable hard disk makes my life easier. I don't rely on transferring files using flash memory and computer anymore on the go.  However, accessing big capacity (1TB or above) portable HDD is proven to be hardwork for the unit since the limited electricity power Z Ultra has. Connection easily severed and lost power several time. Looks like there is a limit how long Z Ultra can.supply power to the HDD unit.

- Stylus replacement: pencil, pen, or anything made of iron
Did I hear a "Huh?" Well, it is unique. Sony decided that the users of Z Ultra are people who like pens and pencils so forget the stylus and go straight to use pen and pencil as stylus instead.  Brilliant decision with some risks like screen scratches etc. Solution, screen protector.
I also found out that Samsung C-Pen (not the same as SGNote's faithfull S-Pen), which uses metalized rubber, work like they were born for each other on Z Ultra.
With this feature, users can freely use almost anything to write, annotate or sketch on Z Ultra. Why bother buying a stylus then? Well, users will still need stylus since pens and pencils will scratch Z Ultra screen surface in the long run.

- NFC Easy Connection
Whoa, Sony pretty much exploded NFC trends by applying easy connection features that now tons of NFC accessories are now available in the market. Samsung and HTC have NFC features.but they don't really put NFC as part of their main strategic feature.

- Dust and Water Proof
Sony might not be the first, but they certainly the one to  explode water and dust proof smartphones worldwide. I would.say shame on Motorola for not exploring Defy series further. Now, Samsung has noticed the.Zip series success and launch Galaxy S5 with water and dust proof feature.

- Power Management
HTC One was the first high end smartphone that featured this newer unique feature, however HTC limits this features to only One series. Sony produces almost every middle and top range of their products with Sony's stylized Power Management. Of course, HTC in turn quickly add more products with this feature and Lenovo follow suits to flood the market with affordable Android smartphones with Power Management features pre-installed.

- Being a tall unit with almost 2 cm/1 inch space on top and bottom of the screen means Z Ultra is the current best suited Android for gaming and multimedia consumption

What else can I say, last year I.made a mistake on deciding to buy Asus. This year Z Ultra has gone down in price and become my new favorite smartphone.

Of course there are some drawbacks:
- Painfully gigantic size for a.phone
- Flaps here and flaps there mean extra efforts required to access USB and the rest of the connections
- Glass (front and back) means scratches and fingerprint magnet, self explanatory here, Sony people might talk to Apple people a bit too much
- New screen means trip and error, luckily Z Ultra uses the 2nd generation 1920x1080 HD Triluminous Bravia technology so it is superior to the previous ones on Z, but not necessarily better than IPS and Super Amoled

Final words on my first 1 week living with Z Ultra, I fell in love and Z Ultra is definitely my concubine. Please don't tell my wife.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

BBM On Android - The 1-Day Review

Alright, BBM is official and it's running on Android. It's not without tons of problems and hick-ups.  Basically, my marketing instinct considered BlackBerry is running a PR nightmare.

Here is my review for the 1-day experience with BBM.

Interface

It's cold and stiff. Even with the new design based on BB10 OS, BBM is too plain. Of course there are rooms for improvements:
- improve touch response
- inconsistent touch gesture access
- background customization
- less repetitive buttons
- larger emoticon (currently sooooo tiny)
- logical hidden menu
- cross apps sharing
- personalized status home page
- no tablet interface

The first thing I noticed was the hidden menu are repeating everywhere, such Invite button appears in 3 places despite 2 being hidden. So unnecessary, but it does hide the lack of additional features of BBM at first glance.

Fun factors when using the BBM is sorely missed. My wife is not tech savvy, but she immediately said she didn't like BBM within the first 2 minutes. Sure, BBM made Voice Note and Picture Sharing famous, but those are previous age features. Nowadays, messaging apps compete on video calls, video sharing, stickers, personalization, etc. The fun factors of messaging which make them "fun" to use.

And NO, BBM is designed for business is NOT a good reason for not including those features. It's like having a wedding cake without decorations, just the cake.

Network Communication

The legendary BlackBerry encryption and secure network is probably the only asset that BlackBerry has, which won't mean anything now with Samsung Knox and others producing similar security.  In fact, the communication slowed down by the process of cross network transfers.

A strange, if not a bug, anomaly is that BBM doesn't appear to have 'First In-First Out' traffic control over the messages typed in. Meaning if 1 message failed to be sent (maybe bad signal or interference), it will be sent later, much later than the next input you have typed in. This makes the conversation confusing to users and can cause misunderstandings. Business people won't like it. Even worse, those in romantic relationship will scream.

The Launch (Marketing Commentary)

Imagine you are launching a rocket to the moon, you will prepare everything and calculate every risk that can occur.  BlackBerry (previously RIM) should know that they don't have the infrastructure to contain to flood of users wanting to either use or try BBM, especially on Android environment.  Yet, the preparation was not well calculated. Disaster occured and they missed the launch event.

The second launch, they knew what to expect, again they failed to manage the risk. Instead of letting potential customers know ahead of tome there will be a line of waiting list for the pin registration, they just took it as it came to them. This mishap caused them loss of users. They should have more than 10 millions users within the first 10 hours if they managed it the right way from the beginning.  Blackberry is happy with nearly 5 millions users in 8 hours.  Even McDonald's gives us counters of how many burgers they served which is great PR for the Golden Arc brand.

Conclusion

BBM launch is a catastrophy and BBM is a major disappointment.  It's like witnessing an Ape Man walking in New York City.  BBM is still admiring the city, forgetting that they should have been the awe of competitors and users.

Will BBM survive the new messaging age?  If they are quick to improve BBM, maybe.  If their headstrong tradition dictates BBM is good enough, well, like I said before, we are witnessing history in the making. This is the 'do or die' time for BlackBerry.  Either we, the users, will attend a funeral soon or a celebration of success.

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

First Impression: BBM on Android - Official - Part 4

Finally, after false start, frozen server, damaged network, BlackBerry sold, re-announcement. It's here, BBM the official app for Android.

Here is the Playstore link: "BBM" - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.bbm

It's free and still so many fake apps, so follow the link, you will be okay.

The Impression

Well, similar to the beta with minor revisions. Obviously, Smoother than the beta. However, with layer of network communication required for BBM to get connections, the app messaging is a tad slower.

The menu is simple. Swipe left to right for main messaging menu, right to left for specifically parts menu (like chat, groups, etc).







As for initial registration, for those who has registered, you can just login with your email and password.

For those who has not registered, follow the registration process.

If you want to change email registration, please delete the old one.

The process doesn't take long, compared to the previous version. Once you registered, you will receive your pin.



Use your pin to get added or add others with their pin. As for the precious and addictive groups, scan the group barcode to gain access to the group.

Turning on and off the annoying notification is also easy, by opening the group or person chat, Swipe the menu right to left or access it with the 3 dot menu button on left bottom corner. The toggle of notification can be found there.

Sending voice note and pictures are also smooth, without a hitch.

As mentioned, the only problem that I can notice, or you will soon notice, is the sending and receiving is not as fast as other messaging apps due to the multi-layers network connectivity: BBM App to Internet then to BBM network.

It's not an impressive app, but simple to run and you can get BBM connection.

It's a good beginning though, not major nor impressive, but BlackBerry has finally reopen the BBM to Android. That means BlackBerry, at least, did what they promised. So go ahead and use BBM, the original yet not the best.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

First Impression: BBM On Android Part 3 - The Rollercoaster?

Is it on? Nope. In fact, BBM for Android and iOS got delayed again.

Some news has spread that it will be turned on again on 27th September, BlackBerry has denied the news and the stated it will not be this week.

Well, here is the rollercoaster ride. Today, both Mashable and The Guardian has released an article that BlackBerry has been sold to Fairfax Financial for US$ 4.7 billions. Fairfax Financial previously owned 10% of BlackBerry shares, now the sole owner. That means Blackberry stock was sold at $9. BlackBerry stock highest price was $128 in 2008.

So what's the deal? Looks like after losing eearly US$ 1 billion in 2nd quarter 2013 due to the failed Z10 and stumbling on the launch of BBM on Android and iOS, BlackBerry has lost more than just their pride. They have lost money, time and market confidence.

My opinion that Fairfax Financial will resell BlackBerry later on to gain higher price, meanwhile the money will be used to salvage whatever BlackBerry still has as their saving grace. Most likely to relaunch BBM on Android and iOS, and also paying the 4500 employees they said good bye to. If I work for BlackBerry, becoming the first 4500 now looks more promising than fighting with the sinking ship.

So my guess, we still need to wait the news of when BlackBerry is ready to launch BBM on Android. My guess is next month. Sorry guys, this rollersoacter is a bad news for now. At least, I was right, we are witnessing a milestone in history: the sinking of BlackBerry.

Saturday, September 21, 2013

First Impression: BBM on Android Part 2

Okay, today is 21st September 2013. This is the day Blackberry promised BBM will be on Google Playstore. It is 22:15 and BBM is still not in the Playstore yet. Lucky me, a friend send me a link to download what seems to be a beta version of BBM for me to test. My apology to BlackBerry for testing it before it enters the market, but then agan it will help you marketing wise and who knows my input can provide some future enhancement for BBM.

The first time you open the BBM app, you will be ask to register yourself usng a valid email. Just follow the procedure and you will receive your BBM Pin. If you forgot to safe your in number, click your name on top to open this screen:



Click on Show Barcode to open this screen below and you have your pin there.



Note: All personal details of my friend and I are covered to protect our personal details.

Afterwards, you are ready to use BBM.

Warning: what I use is a working beta version, so the released version might be different, but the operation should not be too far from this beta version.

Now, my impression on BBM:

Initial Processes

The email registration to get the pin is a bit annoying, but all messaging apps are alike. It takes sometimes to finish the registration, so bare with it guys.

Screen Design

Simple, very BlackBerry 10 and easy to understand.







It is clear that the sense of menu organization style is totally different to most messaging app in Android. BlackBerry keeps everything as simple as possible, but they should think about not spreading the menu all over the place (hidden in right, left, and bottom panels). For Android users, too many hidden menu doesn't mean the app is cool but making it less accessible.

Also, the screen are only designed for smartphones, not tablet. I do hope the released version can compensate for tablet so user like won't have to turn the tablet back and forth. Please also note, some users are using smartpones that can be switched into tablets, like Asus Padfone.

Chat Screen




It's BBM. What can I say? Well, why is that emoji so tiny? Please remember that millions of BBM users are youngsters and elders and Android some smartphones' screens have higher resolution, some even reached over 1920x1080 pixels. BlackBerry needs compensate the possibility that the screen resolutions have different calculation of font sizes.

Other than that, the limited picture size is a breeze to download quickly. The message sending status is always the advantage over competitors.

Some Unstability

Maybe because I'm testing a beta version, but some unstability, if not weird functionality is happening. Mine is I cannot be invited, but I can invite others. Another friend can invite, but the acceptance didn't get through. Another cannot invite or get invited.

Background Operation

As usual, BBM is always running in the background so it will always be on. A small BBM icon will appear and stays there. In notification screen, it will state 'Connected' as its status. When you received a messege from your friend, it will appear as additional notification with your friend's name and profile pic appear to the left ofthe message.

Conclusion on Part 2

So far, BBM has created, accidentally or planned, a strong viral marketing in Android community, especially in Indonesia and India, a lot of peole cannot wait for BBM to arrive. Even BlackBerry's management down here has stated that their BBM will surpass WhatsApp or Line. That remains to be seen.

This first impression will continue on Part 3 when the released version finally downloadable in Playstore.

Thursday, September 19, 2013

First Impression: BBM on Android (and iOS) Part 1

BlackBerry on Android, must be the 'If I can't beat them, join them' kinda strategy. It is, since 2 years ago, the rumors of BlackBerry Messenger coming to Android has been floating like wild fire. It's not that it is an important move for BlackBerry, but ever since they lost their market and the failure of the numorous BlackBerry units selling as before in the market has put the in the corner of being one of the most high profile surrender to your competitors move. It was not the first time BlackBerry has done this, in the early years BlackBerry has given Windows Mobile (the years of stylus popularity) in April 2007. Now, September 2013, BlackBerry gives Android and iOS access to their so-called secure messeging channel of BBM. A new piece of historical milestone in technology industry.

Viral Marketing strategy.

BlackBerry has released a viral marketing strategy by throwing out a working beta version of Android apk in the Internet several times to create a buzz on BBM release on Android since last year. Recently, they actualy release a working apk downloadable in the Internet for those who are interested to try. This time around, potential users must provide email address to access their server and somehow it went through. The strategy relies on selected social media using tech savvy users.

What does this mean?

It is no secret that BB10 OS is not a success, the investment going into revamping the already dying OS by copying populars schemes, background, slide gestures and menu access are nothing new to Android, iOS and Window Phone users. The usage of soft keyboard to boost BB10 OS has not helped much. BB later released the old and tired physical QWERTY keyboard they popularized.
And as the closing statement, Research In Motion, the mother company changed their name to BlackBerry, and recently release a statement that in November they will announce the name of the company that will 'buy' BlackBerry.
BlackBerry, the giant, has fallen to a fruit and a little robot that took over the world.

BBM on Android and iOS Feels and Look

Let's just say it won't change much, but the looks has been long copied and now copying the competitors to gain popularity, which is a major failure. I tested the so-called beta version without beng able to access the server. It's stuck on Setting Up BBM cycle since the server is not up and running yet. One thing for certain, it will require min of Android ICS (4.0) anf iOS 6 to run BBM.



First Part Closing

I can respect BlackBerry as company with a principle to provide continuous communication solution to their users commitment. Even if there is a possibility that their company and technology will be destroyed by the new owner, they released BBM to the masses for continuous service for at least another year or two. As announced, 21st September 2013, everyone using Android can download BBM from the Playstore, iOS iTunes later that week.

BlackBerry is a sore winner, but at least they are a sore loser.

Friday, August 30, 2013

Service Center Adventure Report

As you might know, I have been using various brand of mobile phones: Motorola, Apple, Samsung, BlackBerry, HTC and Asus. Part of buying a new phone is also to know what and how is their Service Center works. If your phone has problems, you ight need to face them.

Here are my Reviews on branded phone and their Service Center:

1. Motorola

I have used Motorola Milestone, the GSM version of the original Motorola Droid for international market, for about nearly 2 years. It was my first Android phone.
The phone unit is heavy for its size, being made mostly from metal. The physical keyboard added it's weight. However, I have never have any problem with this unit and never sent it to service center. Brilliant product.
However, Motorola Service Center in Indonesia can be considered rare and hard to find. I don't know whether they are confident of their products or just too expensive to open more.

2. Apple's iPad

Well, it's obviously not a phone and don't make calls. But it is a gadget using SIM card and mobile Internet, so I put it in this list.
Service Centers are spread well. Easy to find also, like in Ratu Plaza, Roxy and Mangga Dua. However, the spare parts are too expensive, the service time is too long coz they need to send it to Singapore.
Unit itself is sturdy as long as you don't drop it. If you do, you're out of luck and need to prepare for the headache of expensive replacement spare parts.

3. Samsung

My first Samsung smartphone is Samsung Galaxy Note N7000, I bought it at its launch after waiting in a long line.
Out of all the service centers, Samsung is probably has the best valued service centers. Easy to find, service is adequate, if not better than competitors, and considerably Fast. Faster than competitors. In max 4 days, you either get your phone fixed or get to know when it will be done. The spare parts, although some are expensive, are reasonably priced. You know you bought a good phone that gets the best after sales when you buy a Samsung smartphone.
Samsung Galaxy Note is famous for having charger USB connector problems. Mine was the power input board got fried. So know it and be prepared.

4. BlackBerry

Fast, but illegal. Confused? BlackBerry, like other American companies, underestimate the huge population number of Indonesia, hence they don't immediately open a Service Center. So tons of non-motorized service centers Pop out everywhere. If you want the authorized service center, your unit will be sent to Singapore.
About 5 years ago, they finally open an office in Jakarta and has several authorized services centers. Nice strategy, fast service means losing your warranty. But for customers, bad after sales services for years and years
All BlackBerry units have problems with the pointing tools, track balls or track pads.

5. HTC

Among all, I must congratulate HTC as the worst service center for international companies, even worse than the local ones.
The staffs are polite but always ask to wait. My phone was held for repaired for 2 months and was asked to wait for another month. Apparently, this happens all over the world. Better avoid HTC if you can.
HTC always have spare parts problems, whether it's the screen or the charger connector or whatever. However, they do creatively build a functional and useful smartphones among all brands.

6. Asus

Asus Padfone 2 can be considered a successful smartphone / tablet. However the unit is easily damaged. You dropped it, just cry and don't bother to repair it. The spare parts are expensive.
The service staffs are very friendly and they always do what they promised. However, Asus internal procedure is slow. It took them 1 week to diagnose the problem, 1 more week to repair it if they have the spare part.

7. Nokia

Is probably the most experienced and the most professional among all smartphone service centers. Their service centers are located in the busiest phone reseller centers and each region has at least 1.
You probably need to wait in a long line cause they have the most units of mobile phones sold, but the service is quick, polite, spare parts always ready, and reasonably priced.

I put Nokia Service Center as the best smartphone service center in Indonesia.

Other brands that I have not been able to review is Sony, Huawei, ZTE, and LG. I have never used any of their devices so it's not fair for me to review them.

So there, those are my reviews of smartphones' brands' service centers. Feel free to leave any comment and share your experience also.